'Both poets Essay\r'

'Both poets atomic number 18 writing close an baffle of the a ilk(p) thing, a give up. Hughes’ however, is a bad turn in and Clarke’s is a good birth. Although they be relating the same subject, the two poems are actually disparate, not scarcely in the style of writing barely in the story and atmosp here. The themes in both are the alliance of career and death. They both start by view the atmosphere with the weather. Hughes depicts a bad atmosphere by describing the worst of winter days: â€Å"Ice lead-in Out of a downpour dishclout sunrise”. In contrast Clarke expresses the loveliest day of the year:\r\nâ€Å"The stillest, hottest day of the summer” Also Hughes describes the inhospitable environment of the: â€Å"Mudded slope” So right from the start it can be seen that Hughes is freeing to be relating a bad birth, and Clarke’s is departure to be good. An other similarity is a technique they using up here which is allitera tion, a technique that Hughes is very fond of. Here Hughes commits the hard, harsh goodishing Ds to get across the atmosphere and Clarke utilises fragile alleviate sounding Ss. Both poems are in addition curry in the poet’s native area. Hughes is very true(a) forward right from the start in what it is about:\r\nâ€Å"A lamb could not get born. ” Clarke likewise gets the picture across straight away: â€Å"A lamb was born in a orbital cavity” So as you can see the building and use of techniques is very similar but the centre is opposite. In the labour, Clarke, emphasizes the calm down and calmness of the birth. One of the ship canal she does this is by making little of the physical aspect, simply describing: â€Å"Her sides heaving, a focus Of restlessness in the drop calm Her calling at the odds with the silence. ” Her disorder briefly disturbs the silence of this still day. It is also a fast, easy delivery: â€Å"Hot slippery the scal ding\r\n kid came and the cow stood up. ” Clarke, as you can see, concentrates on the ease and speed of the birth but also involves a unsound picture of the surroundings not tho the labour and birth. Hughes, on the other delve, focuses very oft fair on the birth and does not bring in the wider picture of his surroundings. He also gets across the difficulty of the prolonged birth for himself and the ewe, being such(prenominal) to a greater extent involved in the birth than Clarke. He uses short strong discussions to give concern and intensity: he is ‘wrestling’ while the sheep ‘groans’; he hauled’ while she ‘cried out.\r\n‘ The effort is hypothesiseed in the repetition of the ledger ‘pushed’ but once it is past the head and shoulders it comes, like Clarke’s, fast and easily: â€Å"The long sudden, yolk color Parcel of life” Clarke describes the birth as a nice comfortable experience, through imag ery; she gets across the gentleness and beautifulness of the birth: â€Å"The light flowed out, leaving stars and lucidity” â€Å"The cow stood up, her cool flanks like white flowers in the dark. ” In contrast Hughes gives a detailed, and rather low description of the deformed head of the lamb: â€Å"A blood ball swollen\r\nTight in its black felt, its mouth gap Squashed crooked, speech stuck out, black majestic. ” This is great imagery describing the limp, bloated head with the purple deoxygenated blood and short black wool on its head. Although both of these poems are written in initiative person they are different, Hughes is very much physically involved in the experience and plays a larger-than-life part in it. He is always referring to what it was he had to do: â€Å"I caught with a rope”; â€Å"I felt inside”; â€Å"I saw it was idle”; â€Å"I pushed” It is forced onto the reader every mavin little point, and this is cle arly intentional.\r\nOn the other hand Clarke’s perspective is very different, she is much more meet an observer and simply invites the reader to merge her, although she does exculpate references to her own personal experiences as a mother: â€Å"I could feel the overstuffed drink Of the new born, the tugging pleasure Of bruised recording” Clarke also brings in a much wider picture than Hughes rather than pickaxe at every one little detail. So though both are in initiative person they are put across very different. Both poets use literary techniques to boost their imagery, but like everything else they use them in very different ways, same techniques, variation in use.\r\nObviously Clarke uses these techniques in such a way that they are soft and tender sounding for physical exertion when she uses alliteration it is soft ‘S’s and ‘M’s that are used: â€Å"Measured the volume of the sky; the hills brimmed with entranceway darknessâ₠¬Â; â€Å"soft sucking. ” In contrast to this, Hughes’ use of these techniques is much More graphical and harsh, in this example the use of the ‘B’ more or less seems to give the sound of the head bobbing up and down, like Hughes says he likes to use words that you can touch, feel, hear as hale as see: â€Å"Blackish lump bobbed at her backend”\r\nSo here you can hear, see and almost feel the nodding head and again here you can hear and feel the lamb slithering out: â€Å"Smoking slither of oils, soups, syrups” Although he does use these harsh sounding images there is one repose where he uses soft sounding alliteration it is when he is telling about how the birth should have been just to contrast against the awfulness of this birth and make just that bit worse: â€Å"Tip-toe, his toes Tucked up low his nose”. When is comes to the structure of the poem, even it reflects the mood of poem.\r\nHughes splits up some of his sentences ov er lines, this makes it a bit arrhythmical to maybe reflect the uneasiness of the birth and it is also used to give emphasis to the last word of the line, also ‘February 17th’ is in one big chunk of text and is not split into stanzas, this is make it tense and slightly uneasy for the reader. On the other hand Clarke has two short stanzas the maybe reflect the ease and guilelessness of the delivery, she also uses the technique of change integrity sentences over two lines but her poem in general has a much more nut structure.\r\nSo in some ways the poems are identical because they have the same subject and themes, life and death, also they use all the same techniques so without reading it and just being told this you would begin to guess they were the same. But Hughes is a lot more straightforward and down to earth in the way he tells the story, also he concentrates on just the birth and goes into a lot of detail.\r\n'