Analysis of Much Ado About Nothing Essay -- William Shakespeare Plays

Analysis of Much spat near Nothing Much Ado About Nothing illustrates a kind of deliberately puzzling title that seems to have been popular in the late 1590s (ex "As You Like It"). Indeed, the period of play is about nothing it follows the relationships of Claudio and paladin (which is constantly hampered by plots to disrupt it), and in the end, the play culminates in the two other main characters falling in love (Beatrice and Bena* outlaw*), which, because it was an force that was quite predictable, proves to be "much ado about nothing". The pronunciation of the word nothing would, in the late 16th Century, have been noting, and so the title also app arntly suggests a pun on the word, noting, and on the use of the word note as an expression of music. In number two, scene two ,Balthasar is encouraged to sing, but declines, saying, note this before my notes thithers not a note of mine thats worth(predicate) the noting. (53-54) Howalways, forefather Pedro reto rts, Note notes, forsooth, and nothing, playing on Balthasars words, and also demanding that he pay attention to his music and nothing else. In addition, much of the play is dedicated to people noting (or observing) the actions of others (such as the trick played on Beatrice and Bene*censored* by Leonato, hotshot and Claudio) they often observe and overhear one another, and thence make a great deal out of very niggling. writer The political and cultural events of the 15 century had a large captivate on Shakespeares work. In Much Ado About Nothing, go into Pedro, Prince of Arragon, apply John, his brother, Borachio his servant, Bene*censored*, a young lord, and Claudio his best friend are all returning from war, and have been invited to stay with Leonato for a month. Shakespeares antagonist Don John, bears much resemblance to Don John of Austria, the illegitimate son of Charles V, half-brother to the King of Aragon who defeated the Turks at Lepanto and returned to Messina afte r his victory in October of 1571. Don John of Austria had many of the qualities that Shakespeares Don John did, he was not on good terms with his brother, and although he tried with much effort to master status, he was frequently humiliated in attempts to bring himself fame. Shakespeare was known to heap parallels between his characters and actual historical figures, in an attempt to produce a sort abstract history of the times (ex... ... if he does see supporter in another mans arms, that he will in public shame her at their wedding tomorrow. Later that evening, Claudio witnesses the encounter between "Hero" (who is really Margret and Borachio. The day after, Claudio publicly accuses Hero in adultery and refuses to bond her. Hero is shocked so much that she faints during that scene. So, the love from the first caboodle, between Claudio and Hero has been destroyed so easily only by a scene set up by Don John. only if selfishness is seen in this speech. Claudio public ly accuses Hero in cheating on him without severe to talk to her first. And even if she did cheat on him, why would he indispensableness to hurt her so much? This aspect presents the fact that he credibly loves himself, but not Hero. Its easy then, to doubt whether the love was ever real between the two characters characters. Why did it take so little effort to influence them? Bibliography Sources Buckler, John Hill, Bennet D. McKay, John P. A memoir of Western Society pgs 485-562 Houghton Miffin Company 1999 Hieatt, A. Kent William Shakespeare Encarta 98 1998 Shakespeare, William Much Ado About Nothing Bantam Books New York, New York 1993