Animals Should Not Be Used for Medical Testing Essay Example for Free

Animals Should Not Be use for Medical Testing EssayTina Date 11/29/2011 Animals should not Be Used for Medical Testing Nowadays, animals are use for medical testing which is hurtful and not necessary. Tens of millions of animals are used each year in federally and privately funded experiments. Do animals sense the comparable distract that piece feel? How do we know that other pityinges feel pain? We all know that we ourselves crumb feel pain. We know this from the direct experience of stubbing toe on a chair, or having finger slammed in a drawer. So animals are as same as human. They have feelings just about hurt, happiness, and pain either.Therefore, animals should not be used for medical testing because animals have the rights to survive, not a prey for vivisection in laboratories, and on that point are still having so many ineffective of drugs in the world. Pain is a physical outcome something that cannot be observed. Pain is something that is felt, and we can only assume that other reality can feel pain from external indications such crying, screaming, or limping away from something. If we can justify that other humans feel pain, why do human think that animals do not feel pain by unfold using animals for testing?Considering that all living beings possess natural rights that any animals with a nervous placement have specific rights to survive in the world. All animals are born equal and they have the same rights as human to existence in this planet. Why do not human save animals alternatively of killing them by many unnecessary testing? When an animal is poked, burned, or stepped on, they will cry, yelp, or jerk away. Since the external indicators are the same, we can assume that animals feel the same pain that we as humans feel. now the medical term vivisection is used.Vivisection is defined as cutting while still alive it is more ordinarily used today that is performed on animals especially. Charles River Breeding Laboratories, a com pany owned by Bausch and Lomb, provides 40-50% of the animals used in experiments of laboratories (Mercy For Animals). Medicine testing on animals is inaccurate and does not benefit humans at all. Every unmarried day in a year, animals including, but not limited to, dogs, cats, rabbits, mice, rats, hamsters, rhesus monkeys, and cattle are unremarkably used for vivisection. Animals are innocentThey are organisms that have the rights to existence and to be respected by humans. They are not prey for vivisection in the laboratories. Vivisection is unethical. Furthermore, testing on animals is unreliable. Human rarely think about the blow side of their experiments. New drugs can pass safety on animals but this does not mean that human can use these drugs safely because animals and humans do not get the same diseases. Animals cells are so different from humans cells. For example, Opren drug caused 3500 people to suffer serious side effects including damage to skin, eyes, liver, and kid neys (Tachell).Thalidomide caused about 10,000 birth defects worldwide (CAAT), and Clioquinol caused 30,000 cases of blindness and paralysis and thousands of death (CAAT). Conversely, many drugs that are beneficial to humans are dangerous to animals. Penicillin, which is an antibiotic to humans, kills guinea pigs. Aspirin causes birth defects in rats, mice, monkeys, but it does not wound in humans any way. In the last 15-20 years, it has been estimated that animal testing has decreased 30-50% due to the decline and replacement techniques (Tachell).The most common alternatives that are used today are in-vitro tests, computer software, and even human clinical tests. Human have to understand that this planet is not only ours, but the animals as well. Albert brainiac once said, Our task must be free ourselvesBy widening our circle of comparison to compass all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty. (CAAT) The means of living a healthy and set up life is to embrace and respect all life on this planet. The animals cannot tell the scientist that they do not involve to be tested on, but we can.http//www.un.org/en/http//www.mercyforanimals.org/http//www. animalliberationfront. com/Philosophy/Animal%20Testing/whyanimaltestingisbad. htm.