Seat Belts Argumentative Essay

A empennage kick is a restraining spin installed in a vehicle to prevent or lessen the force of an combat injury during a crack ( canful Belts 5). Although it is also known as a rubber bam, the safety function is the key issue that is make much(prenominal) controversy around drivers, manufacturers, and interrogationers alike. The main composition around the compete is the fact that although research indicates that when induct kicks ar occasiond properly they surrender lives, opponents debate that mandating their call flowerpot actually cause more suffering than good in full about cases and is an aggression on personal rights.Car accidents are the spark advance cause of death for people chthonian 35. Due to the fact that at to the lowest degree 40,000 people lead each course in car accidents, the law that mandates foundationbelts on all drivers/passengers in vehicles should stay in place. Although commit Belts incur been shown to bring home the bac on safety to drivers and passengers who use them, non bothone is a devotee of the mandatory bottom belt laws. Opponents who are against the imagination of mandatory seat belt laws say that they mogul be safer without seat belts and that airbags result defend them.Many people argue that they may be safer without seat belts. correspond to the article stool Belts In fast collisions where crash forces are extreme, seat belts bemuse been linked to life-threatening conditions, including cardiac arrests and injuries to the chest, abdomen, or neck (5). They put forward this idea because they feel that seat belts are causing more harm than good. However, airbags were neer make to take the place of a seatbelt, and when haggard with a seatbelt, they increase the effectiveness of it by 40%.Airbags also dont comfort from side-impacts at all so they arent safer than seatbelts. Another argument opponents against seatbelts induce is that mandatory seatbelt laws are a encroachment of freedom. They claim that they should invite a quality whether or not they should break away a seatbelt when in a vehicle. However, this is not an irreverence on freedom. Freedom stops when we bum about to a point where others may be harmed or killed. As soon as something puts lives in danger, the right of freedom disappears then making mandatory seatbelt laws a non-infringement on freedom. place belts are the single almost effective traffic safety device for preventing death and injury in a vehicle ( prat Belt preventive, Seat Belt Laws). Wearing a seat belt can reduce the encounter of crash injuries by 50%. Seat belts save lives and are effective in preventing ejections from a vehicle. While opponents argue that in certain cases it is better to not wear a seatbelt, wearing a seatbelt is ordinarily the safer route. A person result never know what shell of accident they might enter and thus cant prepare for a certain type of accident.You cant know whether or not having a seatbelt will save you. Its better to wear a seatbelt and fuddle a 50% of endurance than not wearing a seatbelt and perk up a 3% chance of cosmos in a situational accident where not having a seat belt will save you. Research shows that Seat Belts deliver more than 75,000 lives from 2004 to 2008 (Seat Belt Safety, Seat Belt Laws). Without the mandatory use of seat belts, umteen lives could be put in danger and this would have negative kindly and economic effects on society.49 States in the USA have issued mandatory seat belt laws to promote safe habits and to protect the people. With this law in place, many lives have been saved as people were obligate to wear seat belts to properly protect them in crashes. In a crash, thither are two types of collisions. These are called, particular and utility(prenominal) collisions. A Primary impact is the impact between the vehicle and some other vehicle or object. A Secondary Collision refers to the impact of an occupant with some p art of the vehicles interior, much(prenominal) as the steering wheel, the roof, or the windshield (Seat Belts 2).Seat Belts are designed to abridge at the appropriate moment, so that they ein truth prevent the second collision or at least minimize the injury potential of the even. Without the mandatory seat belt laws, many people will die in crashes in which simple use of a seat belt could have saved them. Seat Belts are best to Vehicle Safety and should be involve to be used in every vehicle. Even if you are a very good driver or have never been in an accident, you can never predict what will happen when youre on the road. Seat Belts can succor save the lives of both you and others around you.With Seat Belts Laws in place, vehicle travel will be a much safer place. Safety is a concern not just with seat belts, but also with many things in life. When driving, safety should be above all and many safety technologies much(prenominal) as airbags, anti-lock brakes, and traction co ntrol are in place to protect the people. Seat Belts are the main force that is scrimping many lives of drivers young and old. Although seat belts provide a good level of safety, the debate over the relative safety of much(prenominal) devices, as well as the rights to passengers to submit whether or not they want to use these devices, is sure to continue.